News Alert
VIDEO: Jersey Shore Beach Conditions And Traffic

Edison Project Raises School Concerns

Township officials say new housing units will target empty nesters, raise school population by less than one percent

New housing proposed on the old grounds of Thomas Edison's factory building on Main Street has some school leaders feeling uneasy.

The redevelopment plan calls for more than and 18,500 square feet of retail space. Township officials say the apartments target empty nesters and predict a less than one percent increase in school-age children.

But with student population , school officials worry the redevelopment plan will only aggravate the problem.

"We're out of space right now," said Board of Education President Laura Lab. "I'm very concerned … I question the number as to how many students are coming out of the developments."

According to a report by the developer, Prism Capital Partners, LLC, four percent of the 600 new residents at the Edison apartments will be children.

"It's fair to project about 30 new students," said Councilman Sal Anderton, who sits on the redevelopment committee. "And based on the 6,800 (students) in the school system, that's less than one percent."

He said going by the data compiled by planning director Susan Borg and the school registrar's office, one in 10 West Orange residents are school-aged kids. "Somewhere between four to 10 percent is where the population will be for school-age children (in the new apartments)," he said, adding that at most, the redevelopment would produce 60 kids.

Anderton said the proposed apartments would be significantly more expensive than existing housing stock and include a 24-hour concierge — discouraging overcrowding in the units. "It's going to be more difficult to put six people in a studio apartment with an active landlord …there's less of a likelihood of that, units are smaller and more expensive," he said.

One-bedrooms units will range from $1,800 to $2,400, according to the developer's report.

Ron DePiro, manager of the in West Orange, who has been in real estate for 16 years, told Patch one-bedroom apartments in the township hover between $800 and $1,700.

He said rentals tend to be occupied by empty nesters.

"It's a low child traffic area," he said. "Rentals produce less children than for sale. An apartment doesn't allow you to lock into the community, most people feel that they can't build on an apartment."

Regardless of how many children live in the new housing units, additional kids means additional costs for the school district.

Yet, under the proposed development, the township will enter a payment in lieu of taxes agreement, where the developer agrees to pay a reduced amount to the township instead of regularly applied real estate taxes.

While general taxes on a property would divert roughly 30 percent to the township and 60 percent to the school district, under the developer's payment program, 95 percent goes to straight to the township. The school district does not receive a percentage of the payments.

Numerous times, township officials have stressed they would allocate a portion of the developer's fees to the schools. Anderton said the township will pay a per-pupil cost for every student that comes out of the development.

"I'm committed to doing this," he said.

Lab said she remained worried the development would tip the scales and add to overcrowding in the schools. "Even if we have the money, it's not going to pay for a new building," she said.

If approved, the apartments would neighbor two of the district's smallest schools – and .

According to a November report by Gregory Somjen, from Perette Somjen Architects in Rockaway, from 2011 to 2016, the number of unhoused students will jump from 46 to 84 at Hazel and from 29 to 24 at Washington. Unhoused students refers to the number of students that exceed the capacity of a given space as determined by the state.

Lab said the district was working to possibly relocate the preschool at to a leased space and suggested having the developer allow the district to house the preschool on the Main Street property. The move would free up additional space to accomodate a growing student population.

Much still remains on the table for discussion, as both the township council and the board of education have yet to set a . The township council's discussion of the project was also

"As you saw from our demographer report, in five years we're going to have 800 kids that are unhoused," said Lab. "I don't see (the project) as a benefit to the school district."

Gary Englert December 13, 2011 at 01:38 PM
Mark, Clearly, in this idiot's pathetic little world, he thinks anonymous character assassination and denigrating anything anyone does for the common good is amusing and also makes him somebody; the paradox being that he's so proud (sic) of himself that he hides behind a computer keyboard. Sadly, if not refuted, his nonsense might be given credence by some.
Mark Paulson December 13, 2011 at 01:53 PM
Gary, I have one question regarding charter schools. If the schools are already crowded, why are we concerned if a few students go to a different place. This might be a solution so that we don't need to build an an additional building. Let the charter school get their own facility. Maybe they'll take some smart kids away but we are bursting at the seams already. Why should we be concerned if some kids go somewhere else. I know I can get an honest answer from you.
Gary Englert December 13, 2011 at 02:08 PM
@ Mark: I freely admit that I'm nowhere near 100% up on this issue but, a few thoughts do come to mind: 1. Absent these being a "school within a school" new construction is likely called for and that is always an expense. 2. Funding a charter (on a per pupil basis) removes funding from the district from which that pupil came. 3. Is this "opportunity" open to all? Clearly not. 4. Is this all defacto segregation? You tell me. 5. Start an "elite" school (i.e; Science High in Newark) and you effectively have a brain and leadership drain on all others from which students are drawn and you've effectively created an artificial community which neither reflects real life nor the world those students will actually inhabit.
Mark Paulson December 13, 2011 at 03:09 PM
Excellent answers. Thank you.
wohopeful December 14, 2011 at 02:10 AM
Did someone force you to read the postings here Mr. Paulson? Seems to me you have the same choice as the rest of us to ignore a posting and not read on. And while I suppose if all of us had an easy job tinkling the ivories a few times a week we too could afford ourselves the luxuries of sleeping in or not having to work jobs that require varying shifts. While you may be snug in your bed @ 6:40am others may be approaching the end of their shift, racing for a train/bus, or have been awake for several hours.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »