patching...
Breaking: Carjacker Caught After Chase, 1 Still Sought, Cops Say »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Rockefeller Christmas Tree Begins Journey From Morris County

80-foot Norway spruce cut from Mount Olive man's property.

 
0 of 0
Photos (27)

Photos

Videos (1)

Videos

One foot for every year.

The Christmas tree for the 80th annual Rockefeller Christmas tree lighting ceremony is an 80-foot tall Norway spruce that came down on Flanders-Drakestown Road in Mt. Olive on Tuesday morning.

This tree's felling was the first in weeks to be celebrated, rather than lamented, as the 10-ton tree wasn't part of the damage sustained during the recent visit by Hurricane Sandy. 

Joseph Balku, the Mount Olive resident who owns the property the tree resided on, said that the Nov. 12 festivities were the culmination of a whirlwind two months.

"They called me two months ago," Balku said. "And three weeks ago they told me my tree was selected and I was happy to donate it."

The street Balku lives on still shows scars of Hurricane Sandy, the storm that ravaged the state two weeks ago. Broken trees, orphaned limbs and stacked lumber are still part of the landscape. Many residents in attendance for the tree cutting ceremony just received power back within the last 24 hours. Balku said the storm made him nervous, but the chosen tree had its limbs wrapped and secured before the storm.

"I think that made a big difference," Balku said. "It would have been a much bigger target otherwise."

Balku has been a resident of Mount Olive since 1972, and said while he was accustomed to seeing his tree as a part of his landscape and would miss it once it was gone, he couldn't pass up the opportunity to share it.

"It is something everyone will see," Balku said. "It is something the whole country can enjoy."

A row of onlookers braved the cold and rainy morning to watch what many described as "history."

"This is a once in a lifetime opportunity," Lisa Fezenko said.

Fezenko was there with her husband Doug and daughter Nicole.

"Our son is going to be upset," Fezenko said. "We put him on the bus for school before we found out about this."

Balku spent most of the morning speaking with reporters and friends, but was as excited as a kid on Christmas when the time came to take down the tree.

"I can't wait to see the big chainsaw," Balku said.

The "big chainsaw" and metal wedges and hammers made short work of the 50 foot stump. The crowd gasped audibly when the spruce came free, hoisted up by a crane and held steady like a Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade float by workmen with mooring lines.

"That is just so cool," said Mount Olive resident Lori Eckhardt.

The Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lighting ceremony will be held in two weeks on Wednesday, Nov. 28.

Related Topics: Holiday Guide 2012, Joseph Balku, Mount Olive, Rockefeller Center, Rockefeller Christmas Tree, and flanders

Leslie

1:46 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Sad. They should use trees that are in forested areas, not somebody's front lawn. That home and its neighbors are scarred forever.

Reply
Comment_arrow

brian

4:53 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

to all you morons may i ask how many pine trees were cut down to build your houses and how many poor wild animals were displaced when they cleared your lot think before you speak

Comment_arrow

Tryclyde

7:02 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Scarred forever?! I doubt anybody will be scarred for 30 seconds. Everyone needs to count the things around their houses that are made of wood (house included). I'm a complete nature lover, but cutting down one tree that's going to end up being a showcase for the country is not a big deal. I honestly can't believe how many people are upset about this. How many of you kill a tree for your family Christmas tree every year?

centurion

1:49 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Who pays for the stump removal?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Keith

4:57 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Good question! Maybe they could use the stump as a picnic table, or put a gazebo on top of it. Either way, they should replace it with one of those saplings my son gets from school every arbor day.

Comment_arrow

don cheech

11:05 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

that question has me stumped.

Peace

2:05 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

So sad that someone would have a beautiful tree cut down just for a short display. You would think with the thousands of trees that fell that a downed tree could have been used! The folks at Rockafeller center should consider planting a tree and re-using rather than cutting down mature trees. And to think the US is always complaining about the rainforest and how many trees are cut down there! We cut a beautiful tree so tourists can take pictures! Disgusting!

Reply
Comment_arrow

jp1

3:14 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

To all of the above you forgot one thing these people donated the tree no reason for you to be crying.

Comment_arrow

(0)

4:11 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

jp1- if someone donates their pet dog for scientific testing does that mean people cant feel bad for the dog because it doesnt belong to them? no one said the owner doesnt have a right to donate a tree, the only comments made is that people feel its a shame to remove such a great tree just for a temporary purpose, ecspecially when so many trees were just knocked down.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

4:16 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I'm a liberal and I'm embarrassed of this guy ^.

Comment_arrow

I am Spartacus

4:17 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

A downed tree would have so many broken limbs & be so busted up that it would make Charlie Brown's tree look good.

Comment_arrow

Tryclyde

6:46 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Yeah, scientific testing on a dog and cutting down a tree are not really in the same ballpark.

Comment_arrow

XJS

7:03 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I actually think the Rockefeller tree is absurd. I dislike destroying nature for the short-term enjoyment of man. That's my problem with the tree. Someone pointed out the tree would probably die soon anyway. Ok. That makes it better. I didn't know that.

Those of you worried about tree huggers who don't like this tradition really need to examine the amount of free time you have.

Comment_arrow

Tryclyde

7:08 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Just to clarify, do you think the Rockefeller tree is absurd or just the tradition of Christmas trees, whose roots go back thousands of years?

Comment_arrow

I am Spartacus

7:14 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

No tree planted in someone's back yard or on a tree farm is part of nature so I don't at all mind it being chopped down. They start chopping down trees in wildlife refuges and then I will care.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

8:50 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I was talking about the original commentator BTW.

Comment_arrow

XJS

8:54 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

To clarify, killing a tree for Christmas is silly IMO. I use a fake tree every year. It's a very nice fake tree. From a few feet away you can't tell it's fake. And I'll use it for 5-10 years.

Scondo

2:33 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Have you ever been to Rockefeller Center at Christmas Time. Have you ever watched the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade from the sidewalks of New York (not on television) with your children at your side. Have you ever knelt in St. Patricks Cathedral and prayed for mankind.. Have you ever walked up 5th Avenue and looked in store windows in December. Gone even further to Central Park and skated at Wollman Rink and sipped hot chocolate while sitting on a bench there. No the value not the cost.

Reply

Karl Andrew

2:40 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

What incredibly poor timing. A public relations failure.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Mud Lady

6:51 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I agree. How dare they have Christmas this time of year!

clyde donovan

2:44 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Oh please, you ignorant tree huggers need to get a grip on your diapers. The spruce was nearing the end of its life. According to the Canadian Forest Service a Norway spruce in a suburban landscape setting has a lifespan of about 75 years.

In addition, people have the right to do what they want with their property - at least until you tree fascists take over.

Reply

Angelina

2:49 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

relax people (Tree huggers). Instead of chopping the tree down and cutting it to pieces, its being put on display to make hundreds of thousands of people and little children smile. Get over it. it's what the tree means that matters not where it came from.

Reply

JAFO

2:56 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Congrats Mr. Balku. I am thankful for your donation and will appreciate your tree when we go see it in person.

Reply

Steve

3:47 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I never can get used to the fact that so many people are idiots. What a scar on the neighborhood.... couldn't they have used a fallen tree from the storm......What about the children?.....Geez, get a life.

Reply

Peace

4:07 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Gotta love those that resort to name calling. Who is ignorant and an idiot when you call people names? What Balku did was wrong. Donation or not, it is not right to cut a tree to simply put up in Rockefeller center to attract tourist dollars. Just like having the NY marathon was wrong, this is wrong. A tree should be grown and decorated every year rather than sacrificing a tree for people to take pictures. Give me a break.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William Mays

4:17 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The marathon wasn't wrong. It would have been a good economic boost for the city. I'm sorry that some idiots who decided to not listen to evacuation orders are mad that life goes on after a storm. Get a life.

Comment_arrow

Me

4:24 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I agree with Peace. What idiot would donate the tree?! TIME TO GET PAID! CHA-CHING! Oh wait, that's not what you meant? Oops.

Comment_arrow

The Mud Lady

6:53 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I second Billy Mays in that you need to get a life. Saying what this man did was wrong is nothing short of absurd.

Comment_arrow

XJS

6:58 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Yes Billy, not evacuating cost people their homes. If only those New Dorp folks had evacuated, their houses would still be on their foundations. You are an insensitive, uninformed pig.

Comment_arrow

William Mays

8:52 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I was referring to the people who went on tv saying that it was innapropriate to have a marathon while so many New Yorkers died.

Kean09

4:14 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Did any of you tree huggers ever think that these people donated it because it became a danger to them and the house? Kudos to them a great way to get this tree taken down for free.. Also it will make many people smile before it is mulched.. There is alway a reason behind why these trees are donated..

Reply
Comment_arrow

kjchat

5:08 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Exactly, and they also recyle the tree rather than discarding it, creating and donating hte lumber from it for charitable purposes -- see below:

"Since adopting a more eco-friendly model in 2007, Rockefeller Center has partnered with Habitat for Humanity to reclaim their trees' wood for building materials.

Lumber from the first tree was used to build a Habitat house in Mississippi for a family who lost their home after Hurricane Katrina. Wood from the following trees helped to construct multifamily condominium complexes in Brooklyn, N.Y. and Stanford, Conn."

Comment_arrow

Albertina Cooper

3:25 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Absolutely agree with you! If this tree HAD fallen during the storm it would have caused a lot of damage. I know my folks were in the running to donate their tree one year. The tree was ending it life span and with each storm became more dangerous to have so close to the house. Unfortunately an early October storm that year broke a lot of branches and took the tree out of the running. It just became another storm damage statistic. It really was a shame that it couldn't have been enjoyed by more people while it still had the "perfect" Christmas tree shape!

Pete Mock

4:58 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I'm a liberal, but OMG who cares if the guy allows his one tree to be cut? A tree felled by the strom would be damaged and drying out by now. If you watch the video you might note the care and effort required to lift the tree with a crane in order to avoid breaking banches. Seriously people, spend your time fighting for open space, and land preservation, so LOTS of trees are saved, and don't sweat the one tree cut down that makes lots of people happy.

Talk about not seeing the forest for the trees - ba dum bump!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Eileen Stokes

9:16 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I agree, Pete Mock. Mr. Baluk, looks so happy in the pictures imagining the joy that his tree is going to give to so many.

Antonio

4:59 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Their son is going to be rightfully upset at them till the end of their lives... So will be countless other people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

GW

5:19 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

That's quite an assumption. For the rest of their lives, huh? Over a tree, eh? Methinks perhaps you should cast around for something a tad more profound over which to get your knickers twisted.

Comment_arrow

Tryclyde

6:59 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

The woman said that her son would be upset because he MISSED WATCHING THE TREE BEING CUT DOWN. Did you not understand that part?

Comment_arrow

GW

8:29 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

No need to shout, Tryclyde, I understood that part, but thanks so much for asking.

Comment_arrow

Jennifer Reid

9:00 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Tryclyde & Antonio...um...REREAD the story...the person quoted as saying her son would be upset is the NEIGHBOR!!!!

Comment_arrow

Jon

9:27 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Actually, the way I read it, the neighbors said "Our son is going to be upset, We put him on the bus for school before we found out about this." It actually doesn't say what "this" is, so it's open to interpretation whether the parents think their kid is going to be upset that he missed seeing the tree get cut down, or upset that his favorite tree is now gone. Maybe someone who cares enough can call or visit and find out, and let us know so we don't have to wonder. After all, Enquiring minds want to know.

Comment_arrow

Tryclyde

1:22 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

@ Nancy: I was posting in response to Antonio, not you.

@ Jennifer: I know it was the neighbor's son, when did I say otherwise? Antonio and I interpreted it in completely opposite ways, why did you lump us together?

Thirty Four

5:14 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I respect both sides of the issue. On the one hand, the tradition is important with a lot of joy during this time of year and it is only one tree from a private property. On the other hand, this tree is huge and I hate to see such a short time of usefulness after it has been cut down considering how many years of resources to bring it up to this point. The problem can be easily solved with a compromise. The company could have tried to make a good stewardship by donating 100 or 1,000 new trees to the town in which the tree will be taken from. But I don't think the company will seriously consider that. Not that the money is the issue. They do have load of money to hire a lot of workers with heavy equipment to take it nicely. But as the way it has been, the focus is more about extravaganza than anything else.

Reply

Alan Schindler

5:14 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

I am sure it's a great honor and source of pride for the people that donate their tree.

Reply

Jack B Goode

6:37 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

slow news day on Patch, everyone has an opinion about someone else's property (the tree) and what they are allowed to do with it, Attention !!!!!, trees are not people. they live and die for man's pleasure and use...(thats not to say we should abuse them.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jon

7:00 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

That's right Jack. Trees are just like everything else on this planet: They are all here strictly for the pleasure of and use by humans.... despite the curious fact that trees and many other species predate humans. Ah well, no matter...

The Mud Lady

6:50 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

If this tree could talk, it would probably say that it's honored to be cut down to be the Rockefeller Center Christmas tree.

Reply

Karen

10:53 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Why cut down a tree when there are thousands of trees that could be used that were blown down. Leave the the thriving ones alone. So what if it is a little shorter this year.

Reply

tryintosurvive

11:00 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Love the tree lighting and Rockefeller Center at Christmas time.

Reply

Angelina

11:09 pm on Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Seriously. Get a life people. I hope u don't yell at me for throwing toilet paper in the toilet since it once belonged to someone lol n came from a living thing. Hahahaha. That is how ridiculous u people r for whining about an oversized tree.

Reply

Leslie

3:14 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

As the original commenter, let me be clear. I have no objection to the cutting down of trees for use in holiday displays. I was noting the majestic placement of this tree in the middle of a residential yard. It seems like it would be missed. If the tree was indeed so old that it needed to come down soon anyway, ok. Otherwise, I'm suggesting they take the trees from more discreet places, not a yard where a stump is left behind. That's all.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sir

11:46 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

They can grind the stump.

gina s.

6:33 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Tree huggers please lighten up.....I think everyone deserves a little happiness right now and the sight of this tree in NYC brings so much joy to so many people. Just relax.....

Reply

Anna Tivade

7:04 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

To XJS and others,
Please use your fake tree for as long as possible. Fake trees don't disintegrate and are bad for the environment. After my fake tree is completely worn out I plan on using real trees again.

Reply
Comment_arrow

XJS

10:51 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Agreed. Hence I keep it for 5-10 years. The last one lasted 9.

The Good Guy

8:27 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

One day the earth will rid itself of the infection that inhabits it. The "idiocracy" of humanity is clearly demonstrated by the comments on this and many other articles. If you don't like something, change it, otherwise shut up.

Reply

centurion

11:57 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I sure do hope that EVERYBODY is giving the same amount of time to help those in need this Christmas season as they are commenting the tree.

Reply

Tom G.

12:00 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Give me a break people. They cut down ONE tree per YEAR. People talking about "deforestation" and whatever else are being completely ridiculous. Spruce/pine are about the ugliest species of trees out there. I paid over $1,000 to have them removed from my yard.

Reply

Al Beronio

12:10 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I have large spruces bordering my property...they are probably 60+ years old. One broke off (not uprooted) about half way up and the twin trunks came down alongside my house, frighteningly close to it. The size was enough to do serious damage! To all those suggesting that an already-downed tree should have been selected, or one growing in the wild, I have some observations. A downed tree of the necessary size would have been destroyed in the process if it was even appropriately shaped and sized to begin with. A tree in the wild would be mishapen because of competetion from surrounding trees. After watching the process of cutting and removal, can someone tell me how it would be realistic to expect to get the necessary equipment into the middle of a woods to effect the removal?

Reply

mel garie

1:23 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I would have loved to donate one of my large trees rather than have them fall on 3 of my cars, totalling 2 of them, or another uprooting and thankfully missing my house but taking out the power to all my neighbors, and still another distroying our garden fence and one of our boats.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leslie

1:43 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

Come on. That was not specifically forseeable. Should we all cut down all our trees that are within reach of houses and cars?

Comment_arrow

mel garie

1:07 pm on Thursday, November 15, 2012

ya we did have all the trees that could potentially come down on our house taken down........

JAFO

1:56 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

This has to be the most asinine thread in the history of the Patch.

Reply
Comment_arrow

KenD

2:52 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

@Jafo, what's sad is it isn't.

hopatcong resident

4:32 pm on Wednesday, November 14, 2012

I think the tree lighting in the city is spectacular it brings families close together with holiday cheer. I think everyone needs some cheering up after the storm I know my family does especially after two trees fell on my house and riped part of my roof off and families like myself who had no lights, heat or water for weeks. And families who don't have anywhere to go home to. That tree is no ordinary tree for me its holiday spirit its seeing so many families come closer together for the holiday's. If I had the chance to donate one of my trees I would in a heartbeat cause I see how my kids faces light up when they see that tree and it never gets old.
I hope all of you's posting and ur families have a great thanksgiving and Christmas

Reply

rottten76

8:23 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

WOW!!!! Really people :( Good for you Mr. Balku! I personally would consider it a joy and an honor to donate a tree that's near the end of it's life span to be seen by a lot of people in Rockefeller Center! It's a sad world we live in where some people are actually arguing and saying nasty things about a man donating a Spruce tree to be decorated for Christmas. What ever happened to the good old saying of "if you don't have anything nice to say..." Happy Holidays Everyone :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

GW

8:48 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Happy holidays to you, too, rotten! Now I have a strange urge to shop at the Coach Outlet...

Liberty

8:57 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Congratulations, Mr. Balku! What a generous donation for such a wonderful event! Many thousands of people will be filled with joy at the tree-lighting and weeks after. (I'm sure it will be much happier at Rock Center than perhaps lying on your house in the near future.)

Reply

Robin

9:45 pm on Friday, November 16, 2012

Yes JAFO it is the most asinine thread. But what's even more asinine is that I read it!! Bah! Humbug! to all you tree nuts. I love going every year to Rock Center to see that tree. Can't wait to go this year. It's a great tradition, along with the Saks windows.

Reply

Leisa Hudson Hamill

12:15 pm on Saturday, November 17, 2012

I read many of the comments left here and it would be nice to use an artificial tree, but I doubt they make them as large as the natural ones that are cut down each year (besides the cost of storing the darn thing, right?). Is it only me or don't they look much larger on television than they do in real life (MY BF at the time brought me to see one over 30 years ago and I was disappointed because I always thought it would be the size of a California Redwood!)? It would have been nice to have used one that had fallen during the storm, but I doubt anyone could find one that was undamaged due to the hurricane which would also be of the same type, size, etc. I also think I disagree (with someone's previous comment) that the tradition of "Christmas Trees" go back "thousands" of years (I read it's been almost 1,000 years because of its' association with St. Boniface) But it is nice to see that not even a hurricane or northeaster can stop a tradition that makes soo many people happy even in the time of calamity. HAPPY THANKSGIVING, MERRY CHRISTMAS, HAPPY HANUKKAH, .HAPPY KWANZAA, FELIZ NAVIDAD and whatever else I may have missed....so Happy Everything!!! :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tryclyde

12:28 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

The tradition of bringing evergreens into the home during the winter goes back more than 1,000 years.

Comment_arrow

FourScore

12:51 pm on Sunday, November 18, 2012

Actually, it pre-dates the birth of Christ, and was originally for the purpose of celebrating the winter solstace. The practice became combined with Christmas traditions when Christmas was moved to 12/25.

Sue

12:23 am on Sunday, November 18, 2012

The Norway Spruce is a tree with a definitive life span. The Rockefeller folks cut the ones at the end of theirs. Read The Christmas Tree by Julie Salmon. You'll realize its soon-to-be-demise was inevitable and probably salvaged from Sandy by its wrapping. At least more people then just Mt. Olive visitors can enjoy its beauty and enjoy it as a symbolic reference to faith. Something we can all use today.

Reply

David Hamilton

3:35 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I like trees. But trees get cut all the time. This one is just another log, really, possibly, even, a liability in it's original location. BUT, I think the emotional aspect of this event is more a matter of THIS tree being a survivor of such an horrendous national catastrophe. It goes against the grain to see something akin to "the last man standing" getting whacked after having stood the 'test of storm'...........pretty ironic. Wow! It made it! "Timber"!...Doh! On one hand I LOL at the absurdity. On the other I appreciate what it does for the owner and the people who will enjoy it. The tree will build a house and give an old guy a moment of excitement and feeling of contributing to a bit of happiness for who knows how many people. Not a bad way to top off your golden years..........if it really bothers you, go out and plant some trees.........

Reply

David Hamilton

3:37 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012

I like trees. But trees get cut all the time. This one is just another log, really, possibly, even, a liability in it's original location. BUT, I think the emotional aspect of this event is more a matter of THIS tree being a survivor of such an horrendous national catastrophe. It goes against the grain to see something akin to "the last man standing" getting whacked after having stood the 'test of storm'...........pretty ironic. Wow! It made it! "Timber"!...Doh! On one hand I LOL at the absurdity. On the other I appreciate what it does for the owner and the people who will enjoy it. The tree will build a house and give an old guy a moment of excitement and feeling of contributing to a bit of happiness for who knows how many people. Not a bad way to top off your golden years..........if it really bothers you, go out and plant some trees.........

Reply

Leave a comment